North Carolina’s Donald Sullivan says the Constitution gives us the right to travel ~ Wins in Court
In this troubleshooters report: A Pender County man who refuses to get a license plate, registration, or insurance on his truck. Donald Sullivan says the Constitution gives us the right to travel the public highways, and he shouldn't be charged or regulated for simply exercising his right. You might be surprised to hear a judge ruled in his favor. Sullivan said, "I can govern myself. And America is about self-government." "If a person proves he's responsible, leave him alone, he can govern himself, he doesn't need to be bothered by the government," said Sullivan. Donald Sullivan isn't your typical guy. The retired Air Force Lt. Colonel voted for Ron Paul in the recent election, and says our government has gotten too far away from the republic our forefathers founded. "We don't have control over our own property anymore, our own lives, our own anything. The state regulates and taxes everything," said Sullivan. Sick of the government micromanaging his life, Mr. Sullivan staged a unique form of protest. There's no state issued license plate on his truck. You won't find an inspection sticker either. Sullivan says he doesn't need them and he's been driving around without them for the last year and a half. Sullivan said, "I wanted to get a ticket, and I wanted to have the vehicle impounded, and I wanted to be arrested, because you have to be standing in a court to pursue these kinds of questions." He finally got his wish. A trooper pulled Mr. Sullivan over in January, and the ...

November 30th, 2010 - 20:57
Unfortunately, he never t? rati?, you can still some Rothchild b? later calling itself “The Duchess of Baltimore”, etc. ??????????
November 30th, 2010 - 21:23
@ Provc is why we had? Titles of nobility amendment? The Constitution? United States 1810.Les founders Fair? Tr? S, tr? S, tr? S well against the British “system ? honors me “as evidence of scholarship? idiots like Elton John, and the sheeple must now call” Sir “.
November 30th, 2010 - 22:07
@kellyelainewright61 That’s their Federal tax dollar supported training kicking in, isn’t it?
November 30th, 2010 - 23:05
His problem was going to court in the first place. He should have sent a notarized letter to the Court with a 10-day response time, asking (in legal language) exactly how he had “victimized” the State.
The State is claiming to be an injured party, for someone who is not driving commercially according to their own rules!
November 30th, 2010 - 23:52
@1985lsf You did not have to provide them with any ID. Homeland Security only has jurisdiction if you consent to their authority or are in DC or their territories.
§ 3 TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 5. United States defined
The term ‘‘United States’’, as used in this title
in a territorial sense, includes all places and waters,
continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction
of the United States, donotconsent83@yahoo. com
December 1st, 2010 - 00:15
@ MrMaryJanes AmenUS Code? 24 TITLE 18-CRIMES AND PROC? HARD P? AL? 31. D? FinitionsAUTOMOBILE (6). -THE VEHICLE terme”moteur”Tout kind of transportation device propelled oude any other? or firing? by means of m? caniquespuissance and used? ? commercialessur for roads to transport depassagers, passengers and goods, or biensou cargo.
December 1st, 2010 - 00:55
Hi folks, here’s a vid? O n provides the tools? Sary to stop? Ter the government abuses. Learn how you, your family and friends have the power, it just takes a little knowledge. D? Cover what it means? Be a jury member, and register to vote, not if you can vote, but if you can? Be the jur? that he who saves a citizen who refuses? be a slave. Help? ? DUCATE those around you. liberatedjoe @ yahoo. comRegardez this vid? o parents.youtube with your training. com / watch? v = wNHcKnjrSN-E & feature = related
December 1st, 2010 - 01:27
Common Law rights are not blanket coverage, there needs to be personal research and claims to back it up. First one must establish their status, i. e. Citizen or citizen etc. . . Most common mistakes are disclosing/possessing evidences of government contracts (D/Ls – SS# – birth cert. – marriage lic. ) any one of which identifies you as subject to be governed. Traffic cops are only providing the services that you agreed/contracted them to perform, by signing the D/L contract. OH you didn’t read it.
December 1st, 2010 - 02:02
Right to Voyage n' is not placed in us, by a man or a document. We were born with this right, however we have also the right to contract. C' is there that we lose our rights in exchange of privileges. The 14th amendment created American fictions and citizens, who are prone to congresses and all his laws, it ya still of the citizens for whom l' State is subjected to congresses. Created cannot be larger than the creator. If you are really free then to act like him, your contracts dissolve.
December 1st, 2010 - 02:40
right to travel was in the articles of confederation, not the constitution.
December 1st, 2010 - 02:48
PEOPLE: SULLIVAN LOST. Mr. Sullivan was quoted again after that took place. He was recognized guilty by a judge, then he appeals and was recognized guilty by a jury, then he again appeals and the verdict was confirmed by the court d' call. It lost. Google " Donald Sullivan" " north of the Caroline du" Right to Voyage” and lira the file pdf which returns. The lists court, then refutes each one of its arguments.
December 1st, 2010 - 03:15
@worryphree I’m a libertarian so I wish Sullivan had won but the lawyer is not lying. Precedent was not set and the law was not ruled unconstitutional. Sullivan was simply found not guilty of violating the statute in THAT particular instance. He lost afterwards when he was retried.
December 1st, 2010 - 03:58
@MrMaryJanes THANKS FOR PUTTING THE U. S. CODE TITLE IN HERE. I WILL NEVER CONTRACT WITH THE STATE AGAIN. AND MY LICENSE JUST EXPIRED.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. AND IN LIKE WHAT YOU WROTE.
December 1st, 2010 - 04:52
BAR = Colombia accredited Register, nothing d' other qu' a swindle Royal in the bottom! The S U. n' the war d' did not gain; independence, but l' America was
December 1st, 2010 - 05:36
@ MrMaryJanes Forgive me, but I am a little skeptic. Why not send legal documents to you on l' can Internet what the others see, and if what you known as really take place, to learn from you thus?
December 1st, 2010 - 06:05
this lawyers JOB, is to protect the racket of the illegal and unconstitutional “Bar” and every member (aka: officer) in it. GO GREEN, RECYCLE CONGRESS – VOTE LAWYERS OUT!
December 1st, 2010 - 06:11
This lawyer is lying?. Preceding triumphs over the land law.
December 1st, 2010 - 06:38
@ MrMaryJanes Would you support an effort to move an amendment to stop state? Ter confiscating ill? Mange people in your property? Tat? This change will allow you to sue any government official who violates your rights, p? Period. We can not continue? afford? our neighbors? be imprisoned? s or cause of homelessness for? s defense of their constitutional rights to the property? t?. I agree 100% with you, we need an amendment. We could use your input? E, contact us at propertyrightsnow @ yahoo. com
December 1st, 2010 - 07:26
A licence is a contract which belongs to your misadventure with capital letters. Us n' let us not need the permission of these coporations. Licence does not do better U reader any sound qu' no man it human flesh. Just there, in your wallet a collector d' money to pay us the debt of the federal fund. Peace
December 1st, 2010 - 08:13
This lawyer is a piece of corporate garbage trying to keep you sheep in line. Don’t listen to him. Fight the system.
December 1st, 2010 - 08:40
@ BDBakaJR You n' have. You will find the forms on the right, and to say to them that you are responsible for yourself.
December 1st, 2010 - 09:39
@ MrMaryJanes j' had I driving licence front but because of 2 tickets safety belt and me rufusing to pay l' qu' amends; they revoked my driving licence my date d' audience is the next month and what I am curious to know is what I give up to him my right when I am to some extent my driving licence when j' had 16 years?
December 1st, 2010 - 09:54
that (liar) Lawyer is a BAR CARD CLUB MEMBER, and is full of Sh@t!
December 1st, 2010 - 09:58
sold their lawyers? to the devil for me? be members of the Bar Assn. Screw the lawyers. They are the cohorts of the r? Regime artificial Edward House and its minions of the government. They should? Be hung with the judges. The cops are ignorant because they have no idea to what evils they do. They think they are good. They risk their own lives to save others and can not? Be considered? R? as evil. They get off with a warning. Judges and lawyers are the gallows.
December 1st, 2010 - 10:48
I am living in North Carolina and I’m NOT a Carolinian! I was a NC State employee when I first moved down and smelled a rat immediately in Gov. Weasly. As a matter of fact that dick tried to get me fired when I criticized him publicly. Now he’ll be lucky to stay out of jail for his actions while in office. One thing I was appalled at was that he is named as “His Excellency” on NC deeds (I bought property for the state. )! That is an OUTRAGE and a joke. “Excellency” my ass! FMOTL.