My Insurance Haven Everything you want to know about insurance

1. 

   ramdashk
   September 16th, 2010 - 20:05

   Great!
2. 

   Taobert
   September 16th, 2010 - 20:15

   On a lighter note, if you like Gladwell (and have some interest in understanding and learning about addiction, then you’ll love Dr. gabor Mate – in the realm of hungry ghosts. etc. I consider mate the next Freud of child psychology and understanding ALL human behavior.
3. 

   Taobert
   September 16th, 2010 - 20:16

   @ZachClooney Nietzsche will make an interesting read. Trying to will your power over others using their sexuality and/or relationship status over them is horrendous. You probably draw out their insecurities and make them feel bad about themselves. Perhaps you feel insecure alone. Stop imposing your insecurities on others. The unexamined life is not worth living- Socrates
4. 

   Taobert
   September 16th, 2010 - 20:35

   @ZachClooney Sexuality is irrelevant. You want these “icons” to be fully human, as you define it. Fully human= a relationship between a man and a woman near the same age. If he doesn’t meet those standards, his ideas become irrelevant, is what you’re saying. Does he come off as a pedophile to you?
5. 

   GETITBOY75
   September 16th, 2010 - 20:38

   What is so awkwardly disturbing are the the comments that come from the mouths of people who clearly are missing a brain stem. This man just gave an incredible speech and all that some of you are concerned about is what is does with his penis. This author, public speaker and humanitarian has done more for people than most of us. Go back and watch another episode of Family Guy and Sponge Bob. This content is clearly too much for you!
6. 

   ZachClooney
   September 16th, 2010 - 21:05

   @ Taobert sexuality d' a celebrity who imports. One can say many things on a person by the way in which it chooses to spend its nights in its bed? It is naieve to think that sexuality d' a celebrity n' is not relevant. We want that these icons to be fully human. We thus need to know which is Malcolm " aimer"!
7. 

   Taobert
   September 16th, 2010 - 21:16

   @ ZachClooney and I do not see the relevance of its Sexualis?. the Sexual? is just a way for groups of int? r? t dismiss this as something to say. It would not be any question of her? It. I notice a trend, but with? Canadian writers. Dern? Rately, have seen some id? Es tr? S powerful this r? Region. I think Gabor Mate. . . What a great read
8. 

   ZachClooney
   September 16th, 2010 - 21:25

   @ Taobert great writer. Is-Gladwell gay? Us n' ever heard of its relations with the women. How to come? He is a celebrity. I am surprised that the media n' did not approach its private life.
9. 

   ZachClooney
   September 16th, 2010 - 22:11

   Thank you d' to have downloaded this Gladwell interview. Qu' this is qu' a great writer and lecturer.
10. 

    Skrapmag
    September 16th, 2010 - 22:50

    you can even see his personality on him. . his hair shows individuality no tie because its of no use and athletic shoes for comfort and function . .
11. 

    umyady
    September 16th, 2010 - 23:19

    Fantastic video. His such a talented man.
12. 

    DJPashn
    September 16th, 2010 - 23:36

    This guy is incredible!
13. 

    Sh1ftyDevil
    September 16th, 2010 - 23:55

    Wonderful vid? O, thanks for the show.
14. 

    stsgabe
    September 17th, 2010 - 00:35

    running distance does n? cessitent tr? sd? envelope? cognitive function? I do not think so, the efficiency? suppositories? e is purely neurological g? n? tick i. e. halt? rophiles of? lite or distance runners are n? s not
15. 

    stsgabe
    September 17th, 2010 - 01:28

    In d' other terms, the karma
16. 

    Simunomics
    September 17th, 2010 - 02:14

    Gladwell to re-examine l' old “nature vs to feed the debate, and upright, strongly for the seconds. And well done (although the refutation deserves a certain time thus). To take socialism with capitalism vs However, we will admit l' effect from its point of view which the models of prediction have wrong. They s' ** IQ wait to predict the success, but it does not function. In the free competition, which really imports is manifest. ** Socialism requires the forecast centralized, and thus to be more restrictive and more incorrect.
17. 

    ZAAL58
    September 17th, 2010 - 02:53

    Great video and thanks for the show.
18. 

    flapflapflap4
    September 17th, 2010 - 03:03

    @ Qu' will potterzebra; do you want to say capitalism is a disadvantage for all? C' is certainly the best option on Communism. The world GDP is in increase all times. if people in the highest levels s' enrich at faster intervals, the lower classes are always, on average, thus knows a better quality of life against 50,500,5000, or it does not matter years.
19. 

    flapflapflap4
    September 17th, 2010 - 03:09

    I love most of what he is saying, but I do think he overlooks the significance and importance of people’s outlooks and the way they interpret the world. How that influences success. (hm, maybe it’s all biochemical and out of our control, but I don’t really think so. ) I do believe people can create luck to some extent, though, yeah. The power of situation is profoundly powerful.
20. 

    Unekwu89
    September 17th, 2010 - 03:48

    this guy is correct! I have been playing the cello for 10 years. I was unbeatable in my 8th grade orchestra, first chair every time. . When I got to high school and started playing soccer on the team and working part time. . I wasn’t as excellent as I was when I was kid.

    What he is saying is a no brainer once you really think about it.
21. 

    potterzebra
    September 17th, 2010 - 04:10

    @ ELHIEGER1Le capitalism is an advantage for some, that turned out? Re? To be one? Savantage for all (which explains why the r? Publicans have muted their opposition? R? Form of Wall Street). Gladwell shows? the? obviousness: all large systems? my man’s social structure itself? the benefit of certain individuals and groups over others. For d? Decades, athletes are? Your from? Lite Russia Favorites? S to produce world-class competitors. m? socialist doctors, musicians and athletes are? your wrong? 10.00 hours for r? Ussir. . . ridiculous
22. 

    reverenceforall
    September 17th, 2010 - 04:18

    Quite known as. Thank you, Mister Gladwell.
23. 

    STEPHENWRAYSFORD33
    September 17th, 2010 - 04:35

    very interesting talk, I don’t agree with everything Gladwell says but it was certainly worth listening to. Thanks for uploading.
24. 

    Zewaldi0007
    September 17th, 2010 - 05:18

    i love this guy!!
25. 

    txm7721
    September 17th, 2010 - 05:49

    @ELHIEGER1
    Well put!
    Well thought out.
    Solid thinking. 100%
    Thanks

Leave a comment