My Insurance Haven Everything you want to know about insurance

1. 

   MarkProffitt
   August 23rd, 2010 - 09:27

   @morelshaman Malthus was totally wrong. Population growth is not exponential it logistic, an S curve. He also completely ignored the effects of technology plus he ignored that Earth is only a partially closed system. The sun is adding energy all the time. Technology increases exponentially, population increases logistically therefore technology will drastically outpace population. In 1970 Bucky commented that we had passed that inflection point (actually 100 years earlier)
2. 

   wind0wninja
   August 23rd, 2010 - 09:42

   There is no money, FRNs are debt notes and you can’t pay debt with more debt. Also means anything you buy with that debt isn’t yours. What is the source of all the money? You are when you endorse your check you endorse Fed credit. You are when you notice the serial numbers on the currency itself is attached to an account number on birth certificate of the now chatteled property of the US. We have vacated or thrones and resided as citizens deposed of our authority.
3. 

   cpswyl2
   August 23rd, 2010 - 10:21

   thanks for the vid warren
4. 

   morelshaman
   August 23rd, 2010 - 11:21

   1: determine what is meant Fuller separate what I want what is all that I have read commenter.Après only a portion of his works, I can not answer your q bien.Je not supported mathematics, where it is appropriate. Malthus had good results with regard to the exhaustion of resources, but his appeal to morality is less founded. If you’re a moralist, you are apt to applaud his thoughts while I just follow the logique.Fuller was more likely to take math, but he was also a humanist.
5. 

   RunAMuckGirl2
   August 23rd, 2010 - 11:32

   oops. . agility even. . .
6. 

   RunAMuckGirl2
   August 23rd, 2010 - 12:32

   Ahh I understand now. Thank you. I’m pretty practiced at knowing my own truth, in spite of a Lie group. The disease has taken me some mental algidity however. LOL I will persevere.
7. 

   RebelRadius
   August 23rd, 2010 - 12:53

   J' will need to look at two or three times to obtain a better adhérence, but j' have été particulièrement intéressé about customs tariffs. As objectivist, words as the customs tariffs are généralement évité, but all récemment, j' heard convincing arguments supporting customs duties à l' importation which I support pleinement.IE: A tariff of 30% on all the goods importées, would be d' to encourage the local companies, l' employment and to stimulate the productivité.produits américains, of the people and the companies would have a Net favours over that of the intérêts étrangers.
8. 

   DavidAKZ
   August 23rd, 2010 - 13:19

   . . . , I’m saying if you are experiencing cognitive from whatever – source reject or at least be suspicious of it. As a young person when I became confused by what someone was saying or what was written, I used to think it was me. As time has gone on, a lot evidence suggest the source of the problem wasn’t me. Try it as an experiment
9. 

   RunAMuckGirl2
   August 23rd, 2010 - 14:09

   . . and what have I said that is “cognitive dissonance” in your opinion?
10. 

    Drastam
    August 23rd, 2010 - 14:25

    Yes. And just consider, they have already ‘sold’ the wealth of several future generations to bail out the financial oligarchs.
11. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 14:52

    Do you think Fuller had an issue with Epistemology or visa versa ? Epistemology is the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion. Also do you a useful reference to Malthus and Math ? thanks
12. 

    morelshaman
    August 23rd, 2010 - 15:42

    I was trying to make an allusion to Fuller’s style of writing which is full of composite word usage.
    It was not a very effective homage to him but my point refers to how Fuller would proceed beyond most people’s typical thinking.
13. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 16:01

    Return to the “Dark Ages”, then I wonder things like the Internet, if it is a world of increasingly multipolar
14. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 16:11

    Sorry, this is a plus thinker?
15. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 17:00

    reject cognitive dissonance.
16. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 17:57

    Yeap. Kennedy has tenté to put the contrôle mass monétaire and rates d' intérêt of return in the government. Surprised its frère has été autorisé à to live.
17. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 18:20

    “We, the infrastructure? How long will it take for the next president to sell Golden Gate Bridge to bail out JPM / GS?
18. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 18:27

    The problem is there are no companies left to tax. Class speculator sold all but themselves in the North American continent. Here’s a question. Does it makes American products Nth @ Wal-Mart?
19. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 18:40

    yeap. Even clearer -watch The Sopranos. The only thing that is different from the suits is the colour of their collars. Blue v white
20. 

    DavidAKZ
    August 23rd, 2010 - 19:34

    maybe we should write some GUI s/w
21. 

    andredebailhay
    August 23rd, 2010 - 20:14

    Another fine video Warren. Thank you.

    You continue to be penetrating, yet understandable, and at the same time stepping further back than most commentators and pointing to a larger “whole. ” Also appreciate your invitation for us to contemplate, rather than lecturing at us.
    Bravo.
22. 

    Y3rMawm
    August 23rd, 2010 - 20:43

    Suggestion: J' would adore to see a list of reading on your Web site. Your références are antérieures à QE what I thought that I knew of l' oligarch in progress d' exécution of the spectacle. Rhymes of l' history are important in so much qu' tool d' training. Can-être what we can follow new a modèle, and change the music?
23. 

    mrzack888
    August 23rd, 2010 - 20:46

    It is about understanding the new economic developments. cells reach a maximum size, but go beyond it must form a community to form a greater awareness. libertardarians preach the priority of individual cells. There will be no change to the next level with this kind of naive thinking selfishly. we must all be individual leaders, but with a moral purpose and ethics of management to be achieved by improving the human species, and free enterprise are just tools to help us get there.
24. 

    hash4guns
    August 23rd, 2010 - 21:13

    Thank you sir. Very informative, I request will be political people can learn a lesson or deux.Ou just continue to sell the country to laélites and continue to take the exploitationles people. Everyone talks Novembreélections, and how the new élusva change everything, but we trouveronsnous in the same situation or the next pirel’année and will discuss the façonÉlections 2012 will change everything, where nothing ever changes enfait.Cordialement,
25. 

    pronchie1
    August 23rd, 2010 - 22:11

    to divide and conquérir ” occurred in ISM of survival which is basé in an environment and société of not sufficiently recourse for everyone for everyone. Its à l' favours of the people that the contrôle recourse in the world d' aujourd' today to keep this façon to think the statute quo/mentalité. It n' d' does not have; importance if capitalism or Communism the ultimate goal is the même contrôle that power station of recourse to the profit of some.

Leave a comment